Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for May, 2010

“But, I thought you said…”

You’re right. I did.

I’m talking about something else now, however.

Good photography is very often confused by many to be one part photographer and one part camera. It’s not, and if anything it’s really all about the photographer.

In the same way that no one told Pavarotti that he had a magnificent microphone and acoustical auditoria, good photography is about the photographer and not the camera he or she uses to create pictures.

The camera is an enabler. It’s a tool by which photographers express their creative vision. And it’s that creative vision that leads to good images, and not about whether you have the latest and greatest camera, or a continuation of playground my-lens-is-bigger-than-your-lens antics.

This also means that the camera can be a disabler. There will be times when a photographer will be hamstrung by their equipment. I’m not pretending that it doesn’t happen, because it does. There will come a point in time when a photographer visualises something, but just doesn’t have the lens for it. But the key element of the equation is the visualisation; if the photographer doesn’t visualise it then the image will never be created, regardless of the size of the kit bag.

Yet the very technical nature of photography frequently leads to the misconception about the importance of the technology. People frequently exclaim, “that’s a great picture,” and then spoil it with, “what camera did you use?”

Computers are a brilliant piece of technology, but they only help you write a blog, not a interesting blog.

What makes a professional better than John Smith with his little point and shoot is not the fact that the professional’s camera is better than Mr Smith’s. It’s because the professional knows how to compose, how to use the light, how to put a subject at ease.

Since moving into weddings, I’ve found that a lot of couples choose photographers primarily on price. Some will have a (low) minimum standard they require, but primarily it’s about finding the cheapest. Far be it from me to quibble with the demands of a finite bank balance, but this methodology is upside down. Have a maximum budget that you can spend (low if necessary), but then find the best possible photographer you can for that money.

At the end of the day, no one would pay to hear me sing at the Royal Albert Hall. Pavarotti down the local karaoke would have been quite something.

Rest in peace, Luciano.

Read Full Post »

So… hello.

I’m 31, very nearly 32, and feeling very old. After lots of excuses and random reasons not to, I’ve finally dragged myself into the world of online blogging.

I’ll admit to not knowing what a widget is and have no idea how tags work, but give me a keyboard and an empty space and I can type for England.

Still, as the title might have indicated, this blog is not about the photographer. Or more specifically, it’s not about this photographer anyway.

It’s about a photographic voyage, with the (occasional) rants and raves about photographers and their foibles. I hope you join me on that voyage, and preferably have some fun along the way.

And if I can provide some inspiration to you as a photographer, then that will be a nice bonus :)

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.