Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Equipment’ Category

Focus on Imaging 2012 wasn't so much a race to buy the new gear as, "gentlemen, start your engines..."

It’s been a long while. It doesn’t seem that long ago that I was writing about last year’s Exhibition, but here we are in the aftermath of Focus on Imaging 2012. In contrast to the hullabaloo last year over Canon’s last minute withdrawal, this year the noise was of a more positive nature. Although already previously announced, there were several as yet unavailable major new cameras for punters to get their hands on. Both Nikon and Canon had brand new top of the line and one-down camera bodies. In a sector of the market with an average three to four year upgrade cycle for each model, this is a not insignificant watershed, even if the majority of these four models are evolutionary rather than revolutionary.

Back in black... After a hiatus which generated much public debate following their late withdrawal from the show in 2011, Canon were back at Europe's biggest annual imaging show.

As mentioned, Canon decided to grace us with its presence this year having staged a late withdrawal last year. In a long, tiered layout that evoked immediate thoughts of Apple Genius Bars, Canon were indeed back with a sizeable presence and a good number of their new 5D Mark III bodies on display – a fact not lost on pro-Canon users keen to point out Nikon’s solitary D800.

As if XQD, CF and SD slots weren't enough for the new Nikon D4 (pictured) and D800, they teamed up with their Canon equivalents to introduce a show-only GT slot... the Gaffer-Taped slot.

Having made the sensible decision to visit on the Tuesday, queues never quite reached ridiculous, which meant that getting to that single D800 and one of the two D4s on offer wasn’t too stressful. Having got to the head of the queue, the experience unfortunately was a bit anticlimactic if thoroughly unsurprising; both cameras had tape rather unglamorously plastered over empty memory card slots. If anyone’s counting, that’s actually three different card slots for the two camera models – CF and SD on the D800 and CF and the new XQD format on the D4. Having garnered widespread praise for the dual CF slots in the D3 series, as well as watching rival Canon take a bit of flak for having different card slots in the 1D Mark IV (a lesson they learnt with the new 1D X with its dual CF slots), it seems a strange decision by Nikon to settle on different card slots, and I for one would much have preferred matching card slots on the cameras even at the expense of some performance.

Something old, something new. You don't have to be the newest and greatest to draw a crowd - not a newly released exotic telephoto in sight but they can still draw a crowd.

Of course it wasn’t all about the two “main” manufacturers even if it does sometimes feel that way. Olympus clearly decided to have a bit of a presence at the show this year, with the bags from the show carrying their marketing. They also drew a big crowd at several points during the day to push their new OM-D system and the E-M5 camera, with Strictly Come Dancing stars Ola and James Jordan roped in to… erm… do their thing.

Doing your thing... No, not ballroom dancing. Unashamedly taking pictures of ballroom dancing, even if the lighting and backgrounds are far from ideal.

I’m sure the dancing was excellent – not that I’d know – but the PR was certainly top notch from the two stars. James was well coached and well rehearsed in his little marketing speech, and the couple handled the armada of lenses well and ended up posing with people from the crowd for a good length of time, and interacting generally with polish and poise.

Hands up if your bank manager doesn't know you're here... Or actually hands up if you're a Strictly Come Dancing fan. Exported by the BBC to 35 broadcasters covering 75 countries, the series and its foreign equivalents are now recognised by the Guinness Book of Records as the most successful reality TV format.

Ultimately though, about the only thing I’d learnt from the presentation was that the camera system was small and light, although if Olympus’ goal was just to generate visitor numbers to their stand then it was certainly job well done. Well, I also learnt that… good looking celebrities draw photographers with cameras like… moths to a flame… bees to honey… or any other idiom you care to apply. Actually on second thought, I’m not sure I learnt anything as both those tidbits of knowledge are pretty self evident!

This is why you need 36 megapixels. You might be photographing their backs (look at the people in the background!), but the pictures will be so much better with the (insert new camera model you're looking at).

Fujifilm also had offerings that caught the imagination, from the X10 and X100 to the brand new X-Pro1. Unfortunately with prices that take these admittedly appealing cameras out of my current spending priorities, I was distracted more by an unnamed and uncredited image on the Fujifilm stand.

They make nice cameras... just don't let them near the liquify tool!

I suspect that most of us are aware of retouching that goes on to various levels in mainstream media, particularly in the realm of fashion and glamour. But I think what caught me by surprise was the lax standards in disguising the “airbrushing”, to borrow a lay term. Further to that, the various steps of quality control that deemed the result acceptable. In my opinion anyway, the person who did the editing should never have passed that on as a finished product. The person who received the image should have looked it over and flagged the editing as unacceptable. The person who printed the image should’ve picked up on it. The person who mounted the image onto the backing board should’ve picked up on it. The person who put that on the Fujifilm stand should’ve picked up on it.

A tummy tuck gone wrong... it just goes to show that occasionally, Photoshop operators can get it wrong. Either that or we have some very funky mosaics.

Bad hair day? This is one halo that cannot be blamed on over enthusiastic, under controlled tone mapping. Note also the sliver of black on the edge of the frame as a by-product of pinching or liquifying too close to the edge of the frame. Easily avoidable with a little more care, too.

Here’s a hint. If you’re going to… embellish… a model’s figure, do not make life hard for yourself by photographing them against a mosaic background. Although it is certainly possible to do a much better job than was done in this instance.

There is certainly too much manipulation and post processing going on in photography circles these days, whether it’s in the fashion industry, local camera clubs, international exhibitions, and even the odd photojournalist image. But that’s another subject for another post.

Read Full Post »

Every March in the UK, the “biggest annual imaging trade show in Europe” rolls into the National Exhibition Centre in Birmingham. I’ve never had reason to attend because despite it’s “biggest” billing, very little groundbreaking camera technology ever debuts at Focus, with all the big announcements and displays reserved for the bi-annual Photokina in Germany, and CliQ in America – the recent rebranding exercise of the Photo Marketing Association (PMA).

Yet that changed last year when I switched tacks to move into the wedding industry, and indeed almost 40% of the trade visitors to Focus are from the wedding or portrait industry. Focus was an ideal opportunity to view products first hand and meet potential suppliers, many of whom are based outside of the UK.

The big talking point this year was Canon’s announcement that it was pulling out of this year’s Focus on Imaging, barely two weeks before the start of the exhibition. Needless to say this spawned a huge amount of debate on the Internet, with views ranging from Canon diehards who felt greatly disappointed, through to pragmatists who cited trade shows as being an expensive and loss making sideline.

Panasonic was one of the beneficiaries of Canon's withdrawal, with their stand taking over some of the space left vacant by Canon's late absence.

Officially, the decision was made after Canon made a review of its marketing activities for the year, and decided not to attend the show in 2011. Yet it seems curious to make such a decision that close to the show when no doubt deposits will have been paid and lost, and resources must already have been spent on stand production. There certainly is a case for suggesting that there is more going on here than is at first apparent. Canon’s statement to fans that they would still be respresented by the various retailers at the show will be of little consolation to many of their customers.

Canon stated that they would still be represented by retailers such as Calumet at the trade show. Here seen rather ironically proclaiming "Canon Refurbished"!

A photo trade show wouldn’t be a photo trade show without the usual long telephotos on display for members of the public to get their 15s with optical royalty. Canon has made their reputation on this in the past, but in their absence it fell to Nikon – unusually for them – to have the long telephotos on display.

Nikon telephotos on display at Focus on Imaging 2011, with the Canon equivalents conspicuous by their absence.

Arguably the biggest beneficiary of Canon's withdrawal, Nikon were very visible at the show with free bags, and posters everywhere proudly proclaiming "I am Focus on Imaging". Perhaps I'm too sensitive to these things but I thought it was a subtle, if merely co-incidental, comment about a rival company who very clearly weren't (at) Focus on Imaging.

Of course when it comes to big telephotos, Sigma have a showstopper themselves in the very exotic and very expensive APO 200-500mm f2.8 EX DG lens, that comes equipped with its own carry handle and even its own Li-on battery to power the focusing motor – it has that much glass to move! The lens was on show this year, in what I reckoned was exactly the same spot as it was last year!

They don't come much bigger, or heavier, or more expensive...

Of course if long telephotos are an essential ingredient of photo trade shows, so too are the models and the photogaphers that gather around them throughout the day. I managed to visit Focus on Monday this year, when it’s a little less crowded, so the photos below will have a little less oomph to them, but last year when I went on the Sunday the scenes were nothing short of chaos.

Scrum time - boys will be boys!

I have great sympathy for the girls (yes, girls; strangely enough I didn’t see any male models) that sign up for these shows. It’s hard enough being the subject for one photographer under the guise of a “workshop”, nevermind having to look at as many of the cameras pointed towards you as possible, just to keep the punters happy. Not to mention that you have to look good doing it, and more importantly pretend that you’re enjoying it.

"So as I was saying, if you see how the light hits the model this way..."

While the big camera manufacturers avoid unveiling new cameras at Focus, it does however present an opportunity for some of the other manufacturers to unveil new products. Last year for example Doug Murdoch, one of the co-founders of Think Tank Photo, was on hand to show the company’s Retrospective Lens Changers, which I took an instant liking to and went on to order the moment the product hit the shelves.

The first product that caught my eye this year was the Linhof 3D Micro, first debuted at Photokina 2010. At a retail of £675 + VAT, this represents a much cheaper alternative to the Arca-Swiss Cube C1. In fact, at that price it is even cheaper than the Photo Clam version of the Cube, the Multiplex. It’s also smaller and lighter, and manufactured to the standards you would expect from Linhof. If there’s one drawback to the head, it’s that it runs a proprietary Linhof quick release system, so those using the Arca system will need to jury rig an adaptor or carry different plates.

Lastolite's eye-catchingly named Hotrod Strips.

Also on display were a couple of new products from Lastolite, including two versions of the Hotrod Strip – essentially strip lights for speedlights (try saying that three times fast…). These come with standard 120cm lengths, but available with 30cm and 40cm widths. They are unfortunately of standard softbox construction with four rods and a ring, rather than the popup/collapsible products the company is synonymous with, such as with the popular Ezybox range of softboxes. Apparently bendy frames can only get you so far! Still, they are the only setup I know that offers striplighting potential for portable strobes and should be in stock imminently, with pricing around the £90 + VAT range.

The new Strobe Kits, standard on the right and with an Ezybox-style mounting ring on the left.

They also had a new Strobo kits designed to fit directly onto a flashguns. By utilising a magnetic system new attachments can be quickly and easily attached and detached. There is a large range of attachments available from colour correction gels to different sized honeycombs, down to more creative options. The kits include the adaptor, two honeycomb grids, a mask set and gels, and will retail for £100 + VAT.

Korean manufacturer Samyang attended Focus with their range of fast and niche prime lenses with budget price tags. Nikon D3, Samyang 35mm f1.4 lens at f1.4.

For some while the Korean manufacturer Samyang has been creating waves amongst amateur photographers with the introduction of affordable exotic glass, particularly after the introduction of their 85mm f1.4 lens and more recently with their 35mm f1.4 lens. They also offer an 8mm f3.5 full frame fisheye for crop sensors, and a 500mm f8 mirror lens. Samyang have clearly identified a segment of the market that could benefit from cheaper optics and that quartet of offerings should certainly garner some interest.

Holy Bokeh Batman! The out of focus rendering of the budget Samyang 85mm f1.4 lens is impressively smooth. Nikon D3, Samyang 85mm f1.4 at f1.4.

For instance f1.4 primes are notoriously expensive, and the 85mm offerings from Nikon or Canon cost in excess of £1000 each. Even Sigma’s 85mm f1.4 retails at about £750. In contrast, the Samyang 85mm lens retails at a shade over £200. There are of course sacrifices to be made, and the lens is manual focus only; and in the case of Canon users, aperture control will have to be via the lens aperture ring (Nikon users have the “luxury” of in camera aperture control if they wish). Still, for those of us without a spare grand or two sitting around in the bank, this presents a very affordable way of reach the heady heights of f1.4 and all that it brings with it – superb low light capabilities and stunningly narrow depth of field. I certainly thought bokeh was similarly impressive from the samples I did manage to shoot, while build quality was certainly reasonable.

The Samyang catalogue, in focus, at Focus. Nikon D3, Samyang 35mm f1.4 at f1.4.

Overall Focus was a worthwhile trip, and I’m sure it was a fine success for the organisers and exhibitors, despite the curious absence of Canon. That was a decision that doesn’t make sense to me from a PR standpoint, especially given how late in the day it was. That I am bringing it up again is not the joyful attempts of a Nikon user to rub salt in the wounds of Canon users disappointed at their absence, but a very real concern about a marketing decision which has left a sour taste in consumers’ mouths.

The back of a visitor's registration pass that listed exhibitors at the show, still displaying the name of missing camera giant Canon. While the show's program had no trace of Canon in the listing or on the floorplan, passes had been sent out by mail well before Canon's late withdrawal. Nikon D3, Sigma 85mm f1.4 HSM.

At the show I was briefly walking the floor with a friend who had his EOS 1D Mk IV hanging around his neck. He was approached by a couple of polite punters who looked a little like lost tourists.

“Excuse me,” they asked him. “We see that you’re a Canon user. Can you please tell us where the Canon stand is?”

I felt genuinely sorry for them and wondered if Canon had taken this into account when reviewing their “marketing activities”. Because good marketing it almost certainly wasn’t. Certainly at the late stage at which they made the decision they could have pushed ahead with 2011′s attendance before making a more graceful exit from 2012 if required.

Focus organiser Mary Walker said, “Focus is not about one company – it’s about the UK photographic industry.”

Indeed it is not, but at the same time one cannot help but wonder if Canon’s departure from Focus signifies that it has lost interest in the UK photographic industry.

Read Full Post »

Gannet Pair

My rock is bigger than your rock: Gannet pair, Bass Rock.

I think we’ve all been there at some point. Eyeing a new bit of kit to help you get “better” pictures. Wishing that you had a longer lens to help you get better wildlife photographs for example.

I’m slightly privileged in that regard; my work as a sports photographer means that I have had access to a variety of long lenses and own my own super telephoto. I’m not privileged enough that I didn’t have to pay for that though!

So you’d think when it came to wildlife photography I’d have a bit of an advantage. And I like to think that I do, with a nice camera and a nice lens and a familiarity from using both that comes with a decade of shooting sport at the highest level. There are certain skills that dovetail nicely between both genres; the ability to track quick movement through a long lens for example.

Puffin in Flight

And the eels have it: A puffin returning with a beak full of sand eels with which to feed its young, Farne Islands.

I shoot plenty of my wildlife photographs with my 400mm. On a D300 rather than a D3 generally, because of the greater reach it affords me. You can bin any notion about using the “better” camera just because you own one; the extra reach offered by the DX crop sensor offsets any other advantage the D3 offers, unless light levels are very poor. Occasionally I’ll throw on a 1.4x converter, and very very occasionally only, a 2x converter. More down to quality issues than not needing the reach!

I have plenty of wildlife images shot with this setup, and a fair number that I am happy with. The reach is obviously an advantage, and the subject separation is excellent even on DX (remember that depth of field is determined by camera to subject distance, and shooting FX and DX at the same camera to subject distance levels the playing field significantly).

Furry Fella

Shortlisted: Up close with a grey seal pup, Donna Nook seal colony.

So, when I entered a few images into the British Wildlife Photography Awards, I was hoping to get some past the first stage of judging. I’m not sure you can ever really guarantee these things, and the final results are really down to individual taste, and luck, but suffice to say that the standard is very high so anything would have been a bonus. Nor am I a professional wildlife photographer; it is a hobby for me at the end of the day.

I received notification today that I had two images shortlisted, which as a pleasant surprise! What was also surprising is that out of all my wildlife images taken with expensive equipment, the two that were shortlisted were shots that could have been taken with any DSLR and a kit lens.

Inquisitive

Shortlisted: A quite literal illustration of how all that expensive kit isn't needed! Donna Nook seal colony.

Sometimes having longer lenses can make the photographer lazy; sometimes purposely doing things differently, like getting up close and personal with a wildlife subject, can generate impact. Just remember to take care when approaching wildlife, so as not to startle them or cause damage to their habitats or lives. For example animals can abandon their young if they smell human scent on them, consigning them to almost certain death.

The picture might be more important than the equipment, but there are more important things than the picture.

It's a Cruel World

Scavenger and Scavengee: A seagull stands over the corpse of a grey seal pup, possibly abandoned by its mother and starved of the vital milk it needed. Note the hollow eye sockets. Donna Nook seal colony.

Read Full Post »

Durham Cathedral

Durham Cathedral: In its magnificent setting on the banks of the river Wear. 5 image stitched panorama.

Durham Cathedral is one of the architectural masterpieces in Europe. Blessed not just with painstaking Norman workmanship but a setting that rivals any in the country for sheer magnificence, the Cathedral lies on a plateau in a loop in the River Wear.

It has stood in that spectacular setting since building work began in 1093, when it took about 40 years for the majority of the original construction work to be completed. A colourful history through the centuries includes serving as a political and military base for the Prince Bishops in Anglo-Saxon times, through to more contemporary fame when it was cast as Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry in the first two Harry Potter films.

Durham Cathedral in Infrared

A little bit magical: Durham Cathedral, through the trees. Infrared image.

Together with the neighbouring Castle, it was inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1986. The Cathedral receives in excess of 600 000 visitors a year and is open daily as a place of worship. And like many other cathedrals in the country, photography is strictly prohibited.

So it was a surprise to discover that the Cathedral was hosting a Photography Evening on 1 June 2010, during which members of the public were invited to bring their camera and tripod along for an evening in the Cathedral. The fee was a very reasonable £10, pre-booking was advised, and I had the opportunity to go along as a helper from Durham Photographic Society.

Crossing, Looking up Durham Cathedral Tower

Crossing: Looking up Durham Cathedral Tower. Fisheye lens, four frame HDR.

Photographers were there in good number, rendering the evening an exercise in patience as photographers waited with cable releases at the ready for a clear shot. There were photographers young and old, and of both genders. Big tripods, little tripods. Point and shoot compact cameras, through to full sized DSLR cameras. Samsung, Olympus, Pentax, Sony, Canon, Nikon… every major brand.

And in the middle of it all, I spotted someone with Nikon’s top of the range DSLR. The Nikon D3x… 24 million pixels of amazing quality that would have been just the ticket for lovely detailed interior shots of the Cathedral. Along with the very highly regarded and highly priced Nikon 14-24mm f2.8 zoom lens, it was a setup that would set you back over £6 000.

That’s enough to buy a small car in this country. And not a bad set of tools for this unique photographic opportunity, then.

Chapel of the Nine Altars

Chapel of the Nine Altars: Spectacular stained glass, converging verticals and all. Three frame HDR.

Yet not the right tool for the job. Not in this case anyway, as £6 000 of top of the line photography equipment was paired with nothing more than a monopod. Which, as it turned out, was swiftly discarded as being of little use as the photographer resorted to lying the camera flat against any surface that he could find in an effort to get vaguely sharp results.

The irony of course is that someone with an entry level DSLR and kit lens and a basic tripod would have got better results. Freedom to shoot at base ISO, freedom from handshake, freedom to choose a smaller aperture for greater depth of field, and freedom to compose freely and accurately using a tripod as opposed to laying the camera on a ledge and hoping. And freedom to spend the extra £5 500 sitting in their bank account.

I’d take 12 million sharp pixels over 24 million pixels afflicted by a bad case of noise, limited depth of field, and handshake, any day of the week.

View from the Choir

View from the Quire: Better balanced light later in the evening allowed this shot as a single exposure with a Perspective Control lens.

So, the moral of the story is to bring the right tools for the job. That’s not necessarily the highest resolution camera or sharpest lens or most expensive bit of kit you can get your hands on. Sometimes it’s as simple as a humble tripod.

Another way of looking at it is, if a spectacular Cathedral opens its doors to the general public for photography for only the second time in its long and illustrious history, don’t bring a D3x. ;)

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.